Key Pages
Category: | Science and Technology |
Domain: | |
Keywords: |
Energy - wind, renewable, alternative energy, air pollution
|
Outlook: |
Thanks to technological improvements, wind energy is likely to continue to be the fastest growing major energy source over the next several years, but it will probably not displace oil, coal, natural gas, nuclear, or hydroelectric as a top energy producer for at least the next 20 years.
|
Summary Analysis: |
Despite their promise and backing from those desiring clean energy, renewable energy sources have suffered from being uneconomical when compared to dirtier fossil fuels and a method of ‘storing’ energy produced, to give a constant supply regardless of external conditions, still has not been developed. Recently, though, as a result of dramatic technological improvements - including larger blades, rotating bases to align with wind direction, and automated optimisation software - wind energy has started to compete with fossil fuels in some instances and in the UK is cheaper to produce than nuclear energy. In fact, wind has become the single fastest growing energy source in the US (growing nearly 25% per year over the past 5 years) and in the world.
Still, the rapid growth of wind energy is only helping to dent the need for more fossil fuels, because its phenomenal growth rate is from a small base. (Five years ago, wind energy was competing with solar for the title of smallest producer of energy worldwide among the ten major energy sources.) In the US, the net increase in wind energy from 1998 to 2003 was just 1/20 of the net energy increase from either oil or coal over that same period and the UK wind power industry produces just over 1000mw, enough to power a quarter of the homes in London. But with world energy prices on the rise and concerns about energy security, the attractiveness of wind from an economic and environmental standpoint will continue to drive its robust adoption. Only if oil prices drop back to lower levels, massive liquefied natural gas infrastructure is built, or the global economy suffers a severe recession will the growth prospects of wind be deflated. The emergence of wind as an economically competitive energy source has fueled the rise of numerous new wind farms around the world, but wind farm development is not without its drawbacks and opposition. Many local activists find the farms unappealing because they damage views, while others are concerned about possible damage to bird populations that stray into the propellers. Such environmental impacts, as well as concerns about noise, have been eased with larger, quieter turbines and new offshore developments. Denmark draws roughly 20% of its power from wind energy, mostly offshore, and though this is currently more expensive than land-based installations, costs are expected to decline with increased scale and technological advancement. A plan for a wind farm off the coast of Massachusetts, though slowed by local opposition, promises to supply three-fourths of the power necessary for the surrounding region at costs similar to those of more traditional energy sources. Despite its healthy growth prospects, wind energy will not be the panacea for the world’s energy problems. Many of the most obvious wind energy sites have been exploited. Marginal sites will only come online alongside advances in decentralized power grids, more economical energy storage, and more dependable energy allocation methods -- all to help alleviate wind’s intermittent nature. Nonetheless, wind energy is expected to join clean coal and liquefied natural gas as the three main 'cleaner' alternatives to current energy production. If energy prices remain high, wind energy might even grow to the point of meeting 1% of the world’s energy needs (up from just 0.1% today).
|
Implications: |
| |
Early Indicators: |
| |
What to Watch: |
| |
Parallels/Precedents: |
| |
Enablers/drivers: |
| |
Leaders: |
Regions:
Institutions:
| |
Figures: | ||
Sources: |
|
At A Glance: | When: |
11–20 years
| |
Where: |
Global
| ||
How Fast: |
Years
| ||
Likelihood: |
High
| ||
Impact: |
Low
| ||
Controversy: |
Low
|
Related Outlooks: |