Key Pages
Category: | Science and Technology |
Domain: | |
Keywords: |
Space science & Astronomy - evolution, origins, extraterrestrial life
|
Outlook: |
Multidisciplinary efforts by astrobiologists may increase our understanding of the origins of life on this planet and could result in finding biospheres beyond Earth.
|
Summary Analysis: |
Astrobiology, is the study of life in the universe. The field is driven by fundamental questions that have fascinated scientists and lay people for millennia: Where did we come from? Where are we going? Are we alone? Astrobiology is necessarily a multidisciplinary field, drawing from astronomy, genomics, molecular biology, information technology, geology, paleontology, chemistry, physics, astronomy, and planetary science. Through collaborative efforts among these disciplines, scientists hope to understand the origin, evolution, and distribution of life. Astrobiologists start from the assumption that only by identifying the 'conditions necessary for life to emerge' can scientists know how and where to look for life elsewhere in the universe, especially when habitable environments may be very different from our own home.
Some scientists, notably Jack Cohen and Ian Stewart, reject the term 'astrobiology' and the whole astrobiology programme along with it. For them, talk of 'conditions necessary for life' is both parochial and unimaginative. They dismiss astrobiology as, "the science of Earthlike planets supporting Earthlike life". In place of astrobiology, they speak about 'xenobiology' or 'xenoscience' -- a science that restricts itself less than astrobiology, does not presume to be able to determine the conditions necessary for life and absolutely refuses to discuss 'habitable zones' (regions around stars that are conducive to Earth-type life -- not to hot nor too cold). In general use, the terms are interchangable, but the existence of an emerging coherent field (astrobiology) and a radical opposition to the growing consensus (xenobiology) is significant. Because scientists have yet to prove the existence of life on other planets, most astrobiology is done on Earth. For example, researchers have been surprised to find life in such extreme environments as incredibly hot volcanic vents in the deep ocean, icy Antarctic lakes, and highly acidic water. These are the kinds of environments that may harbour life elsewhere in the universe, and studying life forms that thrive there opens our eyes to the robustness and adaptability of life. The search for life in the universe continues in biology laboratories too. All life we know about has a similar biochemical basis but it is currently unknown if DNA, etc. is a necessary condition for all life, or just an 'accident' of life on Earth. Attempts to create synthetic life forms will help answer this question. Advances in theoretical biology precipitated by new mathematical approaches are also helping to set the parameters for the search for life beyond Earth. In our own solar system, scientists have found evidence of water on both Mars and Jupiter's moon Europa. The existence of water is a necessary condition of all life we know, so locations with water may be a good place to start the search for life. In the coming decades, astrobiologists may very well determine whether life exists there or did in the past. Meanwhile, astronomers continue to discover planets outside our solar system, and one of their goals is to find Earth-like planets with chemistry conducive to life as we know it. The NASA Astrobiology Roadmap outlines seven scientific goals that are expected to be the most fertile ground for exploration in the coming years:
|
Implications: |
| |
Early Indicators: |
| |
What to Watch: |
| |
Parallels/Precedents: |
| |
Enablers/drivers: |
| |
Leaders: |
Institutions and Organisations:
| |
Figures: | ||
Sources: |
|
At A Glance: | When: |
21–50 years +
| |
Where: |
Global
| ||
How Fast: |
Years
| ||
Likelihood: |
Low
| ||
Impact: |
High
| ||
Controversy: |
High
|
Related Outlooks: |
Posted at Jan 05/2007 09:38AM:
NO, Jack Cohen and Ian Stewart speak about xenoscience and *not* about xenobiology.
See their book entitled
What Does a Martian Look Like? (Evolving the Alien). Ebury Press, 2002, p. 6.:
"There is a problem with the word 'xenobiology'...: it tacitly assumes that the way to make progress is to focus on the _biology_ of aliens. In reality, the whole area has to be interdisciplinary. The biology is intimately entwined with the planetary science, and controversely. So... we will argue the case for a much wilder kind of thinking - which, for ease of reference, we'll call 'xenoscience'".
Zoltan Galantai
Posted at Jan 05/2007 11:51AM:
Thanks-- I've changed the line to 'xenobiology' or 'xenoscience,' as both terms are currently in use.