Key Pages
Category: | Science and Technology |
Domain: | |
Keywords: |
Knowledge, communication & learning - Brazil, organisation of science, innovation, reverse migration, international collaboration
|
Outlook: |
Brazil could emerge as one of the world's leading scientific powers by 2025, if it pursues a policy of intelligent investment and maximises the benefits of international collaboration.
|
Summary Analysis: |
In the last 20 years, Brazil's scientific community and infrastructure have grown substantially, both in size and quality. The number of scientists trained domestically has grown eightfold in the last 15 years; funding for scientific research has increased (though unsteadily); and output, as measured by numbers of patents and scientific articles, has also grown. Brazil has pockets of world-class scientific research, particularly in genomics, information technology, tropical medicine, and agriculture.
However, several forces have worked to keep the Brazilian scientific community from developing further. Science funding, while increasing, still remains low (about 0.5% of GDP). Intellectual property rights are not adequately protected, and the patent system is complicated. More broadly, Brazil's economy is still dominated by extractive industries and agriculture, and only a minority of the population complete secondary school. If these trends continue, Brazilian science is likely to remain as it is today: strong in a few areas and world-class in a smaller number but contributing little to the national economy and public culture. If Brazil is to expand the number of areas in which it is recognized as a world leader in the next 20 years and make a steady transition to more knowledge-intensive industries, change is needed in a number of areas including the following:
|
Implications: |
| |
Early Indicators: |
| |
What to Watch: |
| |
Parallels/Precedents: |
| |
Enablers/drivers: |
| |
Leaders: |
Institutions:
| |
Figures: | ||
Sources: |
|
At A Glance: | When: |
11–20 years
| |
Where: |
Domestic/National
| ||
How Fast: |
Years
| ||
Likelihood: |
Medium-Low
| ||
Impact: |
Low
| ||
Controversy: |
Low
|
Related Outlooks: |